SREELAKSHMI KOTTU vs M/S ELENA GEO SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - G.Venkatesh — 1432/2022
Case under U/s 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170027032022
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
1431/2022
Filing Date
28-09-2022
Registration No
1432/2022
Registration Date
28-09-2022
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1390-CCH-84 LXXXIII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SREELAKSHMI KOTTU
Adv. LAKSHMI MENON
JAGADEESH SREENIVAS KOTTU
JAI VAISHANAVI KOTTU
Respondent(s)
M/S ELENA GEO SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - G.Venkatesh
SHANMUGAVELAN VENKATACHALAM
RAJENDRAN NAVEENA ALIAS NAVEENA R VELAN ALIAS NAVEEN R
PRADEEP KUMAR JUNEJA
JAYAWANT SHIVAJI PATIL
Hearing History
Judge: 1390-CCH-84 LXXXIII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 17-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 09-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 13-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 26-11-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
This document records the cross-examination of a defense witness (DW-1) in commercial suit Com.O.S.1432/2022 before the Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge in Bengaluru on September 17, 2025. The witness denies allegations of misappropriating invested funds, breach of an OFCD agreement, and misconduct in removing Plaintiff No. 2 as a director, while providing explanations for the use of company funds and the director's removal. No final judgment or order has been pronounced; this is merely a transcript of the witness's testimony during the cross-examination phase of the ongoing litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the cross-examination of a defense witness (DW-1) in commercial suit Com.O.S.1432/2022 before the Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge in Bengaluru on September 17, 2025. The witness denies allegations of misappropriating invested funds, breach of an OFCD agreement, and misconduct in removing Plaintiff No. 2 as a director, while providing explanations for the use of company funds and the director's removal. No final judgment or order has been pronounced; this is merely a transcript of the witness's testimony during the cross-examination phase of the ongoing litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts