M/S LINT PHARMACEUTICALS LLP vs M/S CHAITANYA PHARMA Advocate - NATARAJA BALLAL — 1142/2025

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc. Status: JUDGMENTS. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: KABC170026272025

JUDGMENTS

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

Filing Number

1141/2025

Filing Date

16-08-2025

Registration No

1142/2025

Registration Date

16-08-2025

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1477-CCH-86 LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

M/S LINT PHARMACEUTICALS LLP

Adv. Mario Noel DRozario

Respondent(s)

M/S CHAITANYA PHARMA Advocate - NATARAJA BALLAL

Hearing History

Judge: 1477-CCH-86 LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

18-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

06-03-2026

NULL

04-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

02-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

25-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

18-12-2025
Issue
21-01-2026
Deposition
28-01-2026
Exhibits
02-02-2026
Deposition
10-02-2026
Deposition
17-02-2026
Deposition
25-02-2026
Deposition
25-02-2026
Deposition
25-02-2026
Deposition

This is a Commercial Suit (Com.O.S.1142/2025) proceeding before the Additional Civil Court & Senior Judge in Bengaluru dated 25.02.2026. The defendant (DW.3) filed an affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief and submitted multiple supporting documents including ledger accounts, financial statements, credit notes, and purchase return statements relating to a business dispute involving claims and reimbursements. The case continues with cross-examination by the plaintiff's advocate challenging the authenticity of the submitted documents, with the defendant's witness asserting that all invoices and credit notes were contemporaneously sent to the plaintiff and denying fabrication allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Commercial Suit (Com.O.S.1142/2025) proceeding before the Additional Civil Court & Senior Judge in Bengaluru dated 25.02.2026. The defendant (DW.3) filed an affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief and submitted multiple supporting documents including ledger accounts, financial statements, credit notes, and purchase return statements relating to a business dispute involving claims and reimbursements. The case continues with cross-examination by the plaintiff's advocate challenging the authenticity of the submitted documents, with the defendant's witness asserting that all invoices and credit notes were contemporaneously sent to the plaintiff and denying fabrication allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case