M/S LINT PHARMACEUTICALS LLP vs M/S CHAITANYA PHARMA Advocate - NATARAJA BALLAL — 1142/2025

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc. Status: Judgments. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Judgments Next hearing 02-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: KABC170026272025

Filing Number

1141/2025

Filing Date

16-Aug-2025

Registration No

1142/2025

Registration Date

16-Aug-2025

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1477-Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S LINT PHARMACEUTICALS LLP

    Adv. Mario Noel DRozario

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S CHAITANYA PHARMA Advocate - NATARAJA BALLAL

Case History

  1. 02-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Null

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Deposition

    This is a Commercial Suit (Com.O.S.1142/2025) proceeding before the Additional Civil Court & Senior Judge in Bengaluru dated 25.02.2026. The defendant (DW.3) filed an affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief and submitted multiple supporting documents including ledger accounts, financial statements, credit notes, and purchase return statements relating to a business dispute involving claims and reimbursements. The case continues with cross-examination by the plaintiff's advocate challenging the authenticity of the submitted documents, with the defendant's witness asserting that all invoices and credit notes were contemporaneously sent to the plaintiff and denying fabrication allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  12. 10-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  13. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  14. 02-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  15. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  16. 28-Jan-2026

    Exhibits

  17. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  18. 21-Jan-2026

    Deposition

  19. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  20. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  21. 18-Dec-2025

    Issue

  22. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  23. 01-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  24. 20-Nov-2025

    Case Management Hearing/Pre Trial Conference

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  25. 13-Nov-2025

    Case Management Hearing/Pre Trial Conference

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  26. 07-Nov-2025

    Case Management Hearing/Pre Trial Conference

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  27. 30-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  28. 16-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  29. 18-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  30. 02-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  31. 18-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 16-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1142/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Commercial Suit (Com.O.S.1142/2025) proceeding before the Additional Civil Court & Senior Judge in Bengaluru dated 25.02.2026. The defendant (DW.3) filed an affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief and submitted multiple supporting documents including ledger accounts, financial statements, credit notes, and purchase return statements relating to a business dispute involving claims and reimbursements. The case continues with cross-examination by the plaintiff's advocate challenging the authenticity of the submitted documents, with the defendant's witness asserting that all invoices and credit notes were contemporaneously sent to the plaintiff and denying fabrication allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case