M/S LINT PHARMACEUTICALS LLP vs M/S CHAITANYA PHARMA Advocate - NATARAJA BALLAL — 1142/2025
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc. Status: JUDGMENTS. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170026272025
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
1141/2025
Filing Date
16-08-2025
Registration No
1142/2025
Registration Date
16-08-2025
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1477-CCH-86 LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S LINT PHARMACEUTICALS LLP
Adv. Mario Noel DRozario
Respondent(s)
M/S CHAITANYA PHARMA Advocate - NATARAJA BALLAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1477-CCH-86 LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
JUDGMENTS
NULL
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | NULL |
| 04-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
This is a Commercial Suit (Com.O.S.1142/2025) proceeding before the Additional Civil Court & Senior Judge in Bengaluru dated 25.02.2026. The defendant (DW.3) filed an affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief and submitted multiple supporting documents including ledger accounts, financial statements, credit notes, and purchase return statements relating to a business dispute involving claims and reimbursements. The case continues with cross-examination by the plaintiff's advocate challenging the authenticity of the submitted documents, with the defendant's witness asserting that all invoices and credit notes were contemporaneously sent to the plaintiff and denying fabrication allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Commercial Suit (Com.O.S.1142/2025) proceeding before the Additional Civil Court & Senior Judge in Bengaluru dated 25.02.2026. The defendant (DW.3) filed an affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief and submitted multiple supporting documents including ledger accounts, financial statements, credit notes, and purchase return statements relating to a business dispute involving claims and reimbursements. The case continues with cross-examination by the plaintiff's advocate challenging the authenticity of the submitted documents, with the defendant's witness asserting that all invoices and credit notes were contemporaneously sent to the plaintiff and denying fabrication allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts