Mr.Ravikumar Rajendraprasad vs M/s BIOFI MEDICAL HEALTHCARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED — 1916/2024

Case under Karnataka Tank Conservation and Development Authority Act, 2014. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KABC170009962024

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

1916/2024

Filing Date

11-12-2023

Registration No

1916/2024

Registration Date

06-01-2024

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1478-CCH-87 LXXXVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Tank Conservation and Development Authority Act, 2014

Petitioner(s)

Mr.Ravikumar Rajendraprasad

Adv. Paaras Pandey

Respondent(s)

M/s BIOFI MEDICAL HEALTHCARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

MR.PAULDURAI SHANMUGAM

Adv. Lokesha K.

GIRIMAJI SATHYANARAYANA RAO RAVI

SHANKAR SURYANARAYAN

D.N.PRAHLAD

Adv. Deepak Bhaskar

R.AMBARISH

Hearing History

Judge: 1478-CCH-87 LXXXVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

06-03-2026

SUMMONS

21-02-2026

SUMMONS

19-12-2025

SUMMONS

13-11-2025

SUMMONS

09-10-2025

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

27-03-2024
Deposition
16-04-2024
Deposition
22-06-2024
Orders

Summary: The petition filed by Mr. Ravikumar Rajendraprasad under Section 340 of CrPC seeking to initiate perjury proceedings against six accused persons (including Biofi Medical Healthcare India Private Limited and its former executives) was dismissed. The court found no prima facie case of perjury, noting that the complainant had previously filed a similar application (I.A. No. 16) in the same arbitration proceedings which was already dismissed on January 6, 2023, and the principles of constructive res judicata applied to bar the present petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Mr. Ravikumar Rajendraprasad under Section 340 of CrPC seeking to initiate perjury proceedings against six accused persons (including Biofi Medical Healthcare India Private Limited and its former executives) was dismissed. The court found no prima facie case of perjury, noting that the complainant had previously filed a similar application (I.A. No. 16) in the same arbitration proceedings which was already dismissed on January 6, 2023, and the principles of constructive res judicata applied to bar the present petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case