M K SRINIVASAN vs TAURUS POWERTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED — 2/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 37(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Com.M.A - Commercial Miscellanuous Appeals
CNR: KABC170007932026
Filing Number
2/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1477-Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M K SRINIVASAN
Adv. Shaik Imail Zabiulla
-
2.M/S M K SRINIVASAN SYSTEMS PVT LTD
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAURUS POWERTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED
-
2.M/S TAURUS POWRTRONICS SYSTEMS
-
3.M N RAVINARAYAN
-
4.GAYATHRI RAVINARAYAN
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The Commercial Court in Bengaluru allowed an interim application filed by M K Srinivasan and M/S M K Srinivasan Systems Pvt Ltd (appellants) under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and stayed the operation of the arbitrator's interim order dated 27.02.2026 until disposal of the appeal. The court found that the arbitrator's counter-injunction restraining the appellants from using the trademark 'TAURUS' contradicted a prior court order (dated 16.06.2025) and High Court clarification that expressly prohibited the respondents from using the mark 'TAURUS' till conclusion of arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders
Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2026
Summary The Commercial Court in Bengaluru allowed an interim application filed by M K Srinivasan and M/S M K Srinivasan Systems Pvt Ltd (appellants) under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and stayed the operation of the arbitrator's interim order dated 27.02.2026 until disposal of the appeal. The court found that the arbitrator's counter-injunction restraining the appellants from using the trademark 'TAURUS' contradicted a prior court order (dated 16.06.2025) and High Court clarification that expressly prohibited the respondents from using the mark 'TAURUS' till conclusion of arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts