M K SRINIVASAN vs TAURUS POWERTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED — 2/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 37(2). Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Com.M.A - Commercial Miscellanuous Appeals

CNR: KABC170007932026

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1477-CCH-86 LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 37(2)

Petitioner(s)

M K SRINIVASAN

Adv. Shaik Imail Zabiulla

M/S M K SRINIVASAN SYSTEMS PVT LTD

Respondent(s)

TAURUS POWERTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED

M/S TAURUS POWRTRONICS SYSTEMS

M N RAVINARAYAN

GAYATHRI RAVINARAYAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1477-CCH-86 LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

17-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

16-03-2026

ORDERS

13-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

06-03-2026

OBJECTION

Interim Orders

17-03-2026
Orders

Summary The Commercial Court in Bengaluru allowed an interim application filed by M K Srinivasan and M/S M K Srinivasan Systems Pvt Ltd (appellants) under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and stayed the operation of the arbitrator's interim order dated 27.02.2026 until disposal of the appeal. The court found that the arbitrator's counter-injunction restraining the appellants from using the trademark 'TAURUS' contradicted a prior court order (dated 16.06.2025) and High Court clarification that expressly prohibited the respondents from using the mark 'TAURUS' till conclusion of arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Commercial Court in Bengaluru allowed an interim application filed by M K Srinivasan and M/S M K Srinivasan Systems Pvt Ltd (appellants) under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and stayed the operation of the arbitrator's interim order dated 27.02.2026 until disposal of the appeal. The court found that the arbitrator's counter-injunction restraining the appellants from using the trademark 'TAURUS' contradicted a prior court order (dated 16.06.2025) and High Court clarification that expressly prohibited the respondents from using the mark 'TAURUS' till conclusion of arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case