KHATHIJA FARHATH vs V RAJESH — 47/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section SEC9. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

Summons Next hearing 23-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Com.A.A. - Commerical Arbitration Application

CNR: KABC170004412026

Filing Number

47/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1445-Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section SEC9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHATHIJA FARHATH

    Adv. ROHITH GOWDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V RAJESH

Case History

  1. 23-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The court granted an ad-interim temporary injunction restraining the respondent from dispossessing the applicant or interfering with her peaceful possession of leased premises, and from disconnecting essential services (DG power, electricity, water) until the next hearing. The applicant, a tenant under a 5-year lease agreement, challenged the new property owner's attempt to evict her within 7 days and demands to increase rent from Rs. 56,000 to Rs. 1,50,000 monthly, claiming Rs. 50+ lakhs invested in improvements. Notice was issued to the respondent with a return date of 26.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted an ad-interim temporary injunction restraining the respondent from dispossessing the applicant or interfering with her peaceful possession of leased premises, and from disconnecting essential services (DG power, electricity, water) until the next hearing. The applicant, a tenant under a 5-year lease agreement, challenged the new property owner's attempt to evict her within 7 days and demands to increase rent from Rs. 56,000 to Rs. 1,50,000 monthly, claiming Rs. 50+ lakhs invested in improvements. Notice was issued to the respondent with a return date of 26.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case