PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK REP BY SOMASHANKAR vs SRIDHAR N — 8356/2025
Case under The Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Asset and Security Act Section 14. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABC030737812025
Filing Number
8488/2025
Filing Date
10-Nov-2025
Registration No
8356/2025
Registration Date
10-Nov-2025
Court
CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, BENGALURU
Judge
61-Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
MICO LAYOUT PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK REP BY SOMASHANKAR
Adv. SOWMYA R
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRIDHAR N
-
2.ROOPOA SRIDHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bengaluru allowed Punjab National Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of mortgaged property from borrowers Sridhar N and Roopa Sridhar, who defaulted on loans totaling ₹59.9 lakhs. The court found the bank complied with mandatory procedures including demand and possession notices published in newspapers, and appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City
-
17-Apr-2026
Order
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City
-
10-Apr-2026
To Hear On
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City
-
24-Mar-2026
To Hear On
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City
-
04-Mar-2026
To Hear On
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City
-
24-Feb-2026
To Hear On
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City
-
16-Feb-2026
To Hear On
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City
-
14-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 8356/2025
The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bengaluru allowed Punjab National Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of mortgaged property from borrowers Sridhar N and Roopa Sridhar, who defaulted on loans totaling ₹59.9 lakhs. The court found the bank complied with mandatory procedures including demand and possession notices published in newspapers, and appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts