THILAKNAGAR POLICE STATION vs PREMAVATHI — 4921/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448,427,341,504,506,34. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABC030082582025

Filing Number

5071/2025

Filing Date

12-Feb-2025

Registration No

4921/2025

Registration Date

12-Feb-2025

Court

CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, BENGALURU

Judge

61-Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

77

Police Station

TILAKNAGAR PS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 448,427,341,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THILAKNAGAR POLICE STATION

    Adv. M.DHANANJAYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PREMAVATHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok-adalath court allowed the complainant's (CW-1) application to compound the offence under Section 359(1) of BNSS, thereby settling offences under IPC sections 448, 427, 341, 504, and 506 with common intention. Accused No. 2 was acquitted of all charges under Section 359(8) of BNSS, as the accused's presence was not required for compounding proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Proclamation

    Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City

  5. 17-Oct-2025

    Proclamation

    Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City

  6. 02-Jul-2025

    Proclamation

    Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bengaluru City

  7. 12-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4921/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-adalath court allowed the complainant's (CW-1) application to compound the offence under Section 359(1) of BNSS, thereby settling offences under IPC sections 448, 427, 341, 504, and 506 with common intention. Accused No. 2 was acquitted of all charges under Section 359(8) of BNSS, as the accused's presence was not required for compounding proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case