CHANDRU vs SHOBHA — 18114/2024

Case under -u/s 200 of Cr.p.c. R/w Sec 138 of Ni Act Section CRPC. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

C.C - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABC020607582024

JUDGEMENT

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

18794/2024

Filing Date

25-09-2024

Registration No

18114/2024

Registration Date

25-09-2024

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

Acts & Sections

-U/S 200 OF Cr.P.C. R/W SEC 138 OF NI ACT Section CRPC

Petitioner(s)

CHANDRU

Adv. H C NATARAJ

Respondent(s)

SHOBHA

GREEN BANGARPET PANIPURI

Hearing History

Judge: 38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

18-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

02-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

18-02-2026

evidence

Interim Orders

27-03-2025
Plea
27-03-2025
313 Statement
17-09-2025
Deposition
19-11-2025
Deposition
08-01-2026
Deposition
30-01-2026
Deposition

Summary This is a civil case (CC 18114/2024) from the Karnataka High Court (SCCH-13), with the case adjourned to 30.01.2026. The court recorded the detailed testimony of the defendant (Dw-1), who denied allegations related to a bounced cheque case, claiming the cheque was issued as security for a four-lakh rupee loan that was subsequently repaid two years prior. The defendant contended that she did not author certain portions of the cheque and accused the plaintiff of misusing the cheques and giving false testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil case (CC 18114/2024) from the Karnataka High Court (SCCH-13), with the case adjourned to 30.01.2026. The court recorded the detailed testimony of the defendant (Dw-1), who denied allegations related to a bounced cheque case, claiming the cheque was issued as security for a four-lakh rupee loan that was subsequently repaid two years prior. The defendant contended that she did not author certain portions of the cheque and accused the plaintiff of misusing the cheques and giving false testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case