TATA CAPITAL LIMITED vs K.MOHANRAJ — 18495/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section BNSS. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABC020601382024

Filing Number

18407/2024

Filing Date

24-Sep-2024

Registration No

18495/2024

Registration Date

27-Sep-2024

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

37-Scch - 11 - I Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

CUBBON PARK PS

Year

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section BNSS

Petitioner(s)

1.TATA CAPITAL LIMITED

Adv. SUGANDHARAJ.A.B.

Respondent(s)

1.K.MOHANRAJ

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrdersView PDF

Case Summary: 18495/2024 The Lok Adalath (14.03.2026) closed the complaint between Tata Capital Limited and K. Mohanraj as settled following a settlement memo filed by the complainant's counsel. Consequently, the accused was acquitted of the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Scch - 11 - I Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
25-Feb-2026

Summons

Scch - 11 - I Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
20-Jan-2026

Summons

Scch - 11 - I Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
10-Nov-2025

Summons

Scch - 11 - I Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
05-Jun-2025

Summons

Scch - 12 - XI Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
17-Feb-2025

Summons

Scch - 12 - XI Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
27-Sep-2024

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
24-Sep-2024

Case filed

Registration No. 18495/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 18495/2024 The Lok Adalath (14.03.2026) closed the complaint between Tata Capital Limited and K. Mohanraj as settled following a settlement memo filed by the complainant's counsel. Consequently, the accused was acquitted of the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.