LEELA vs SUJATHA H — 6623/2024
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020559382024
Filing Number
6605/2024
Filing Date
11-Sep-2024
Registration No
6623/2024
Registration Date
11-Sep-2024
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
35-Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LEELA
Adv. M. RAJANNA
-
2.PUNITHKUMAR K
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUJATHA H
-
2.GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED
Adv. RAGHAVENDRA BHAT
Case History
-
25-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Mar-2026
Judgement
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgement
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
16-Feb-2026
Arguments
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Feb-2026
Arguments
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Jan-2026
Arguments
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
20-Jan-2026
Arguments
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
08-Jan-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
30-Dec-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Dec-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Dec-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary In Motor Vehicle Case No. 6623/2024, the court examined witness testimony regarding insurance policy coverage for vehicle KA-51-HM-4841. The witness, representing the insurance company, testified that the policy issued was comprehensive for the first year and liability-only for the remaining four years, contrary to claims it was comprehensive for the full five-year term. The court found multiple statements by the witness to be false, including assertions about policy bundling, pillion rider coverage exclusions, and the insurance company's attempt to avoid liability. No further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Dec-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Nov-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Nov-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
11-Nov-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Nov-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
24-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
24-Oct-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Sep-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
01-Sep-2025
IssuesView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
29-Aug-2025
Issues
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Aug-2025
Arguments
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Arguments
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
09-Jul-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Jun-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
22-May-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Apr-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Mar-2025
Summons
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Jan-2025
Summons
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
10-Dec-2024
Summons
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
03-Dec-2024
Summons
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Oct-2024
Summons
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 6623/2024
Summary In Motor Vehicle Case No. 6623/2024, the court examined witness testimony regarding insurance policy coverage for vehicle KA-51-HM-4841. The witness, representing the insurance company, testified that the policy issued was comprehensive for the first year and liability-only for the remaining four years, contrary to claims it was comprehensive for the full five-year term. The court found multiple statements by the witness to be false, including assertions about policy bundling, pillion rider coverage exclusions, and the insurance company's attempt to avoid liability. No further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts