SHIVARAJ vs SHANKAR DURAISAMY — 8875/2025

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MVACT. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020479672025

Filing Number

8879/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

8875/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

36-Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 166 Mv Act Section MVACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVARAJ

    Adv. B.B.PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANKAR DURAISAMY

  2. 2.GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The National Lok-Adalath allowed petitioner Shivaraj's claim through settlement on 14.03.2026. Respondent No.1 (Shankar Duraisamy) and petitioner mutually agreed to settle the dispute for Rs. 4,75,000 as full and final compensation. The court accepted the joint settlement memo as lawful and non-contrary to public policy, directing respondent No.1 to pay the entire agreed amount to the petitioner via e-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  5. 02-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8875/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The National Lok-Adalath allowed petitioner Shivaraj's claim through settlement on 14.03.2026. Respondent No.1 (Shankar Duraisamy) and petitioner mutually agreed to settle the dispute for Rs. 4,75,000 as full and final compensation. The court accepted the joint settlement memo as lawful and non-contrary to public policy, directing respondent No.1 to pay the entire agreed amount to the petitioner via e-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case