JAYARAMA SHETTY vs PREETHA P K — 8796/2025

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020472062025

Filing Number

8785/2025

Filing Date

27-Nov-2025

Registration No

8796/2025

Registration Date

27-Nov-2025

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

36-Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYARAMA SHETTY

    Adv. K VENKATA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PREETHA P K

  2. 2.ICICI LOMB GEN INS CO LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    In case MVC 8796/2025, the National Lok-Adalath allowed petitioner Jayarama Shetty's petition based on a joint settlement memo filed with respondent ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd. The court directed respondent No.2 to pay Rs.3,57,000 as full and final settlement, to be released via e-payment upon proper identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  5. 29-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8796/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In case MVC 8796/2025, the National Lok-Adalath allowed petitioner Jayarama Shetty's petition based on a joint settlement memo filed with respondent ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd. The court directed respondent No.2 to pay Rs.3,57,000 as full and final settlement, to be released via e-payment upon proper identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case