PUTTEGOWDA K E vs JAYALAKSHMAMMA — 5687/2024

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020466852024

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

5655/2024

Filing Date

31-07-2024

Registration No

5687/2024

Registration Date

01-08-2024

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

Acts & Sections

U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT

Petitioner(s)

PUTTEGOWDA K E

Adv. HARISHA S K

Respondent(s)

JAYALAKSHMAMMA

NAVEEN KUMARA ALIAS NAVEEN

Hearing History

Judge: 39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

04-06-2026

ARGUMENTS

29-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

21-04-2026

evidence

23-03-2026

evidence

14-03-2026

evidence

Interim Orders

07-02-2025
Deposition
11-03-2025
Deposition
19-06-2025
Issues
25-09-2025
Deposition
21-11-2025
Deposition
30-01-2026
Deposition
21-02-2026
Deposition
23-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: MVC No. 5687/2024 In this motor vehicle accident case dated 23-03-2026, the court heard arguments from both sides regarding liability for a tractor accident. The petitioner (Puttegowda K E) contested the accident charges, arguing he possessed a valid driving license and that the accident was not caused by his negligence. The respondents' counsel sought dismissal of the petition based on main trial evidence. The case was adjourned for further proceedings, with no final order on the merits delivered in this hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC No. 5687/2024 In this motor vehicle accident case dated 23-03-2026, the court heard arguments from both sides regarding liability for a tractor accident. The petitioner (Puttegowda K E) contested the accident charges, arguing he possessed a valid driving license and that the accident was not caused by his negligence. The respondents' counsel sought dismissal of the petition based on main trial evidence. The case was adjourned for further proceedings, with no final order on the merits delivered in this hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case