CHOWDAPPA C vs KAVERI TRAVELS — 8759/2023

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: OBJECTIONS. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020448892023

OBJECTIONS

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

Filing Number

8691/2023

Filing Date

29-12-2023

Registration No

8759/2023

Registration Date

29-12-2023

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

Acts & Sections

U/S 166 MV Act Section MV ACT

Petitioner(s)

CHOWDAPPA C

Adv. N.MANJUNATH

SOMAPPA

Respondent(s)

KAVERI TRAVELS

NEW INDIA ASSU CO LTD

Hearing History

Judge: 39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

18-03-2026

OBJECTIONS

06-03-2026

OBJECTIONS

21-02-2026

OBJECTIONS

17-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

10-02-2026

evidence

Interim Orders

24-06-2025
Deposition
17-09-2025
Deposition
19-01-2026
Deposition
17-02-2026
Deposition

Court Order Summary MVC No: 8759/2023 | Date: 17-02-2026 The petitioner's application is dismissed. The court found that the first respondent's vehicle was erroneously included in the police chargesheet, and no proper inquiry was conducted regarding the vehicle owner or driver's involvement in the accident. The petitioner's arguments regarding false certification and testimony to evade insurance liability were rejected, and no cross-examination was permitted as the first respondent was unrepresented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary MVC No: 8759/2023 | Date: 17-02-2026 The petitioner's application is dismissed. The court found that the first respondent's vehicle was erroneously included in the police chargesheet, and no proper inquiry was conducted regarding the vehicle owner or driver's involvement in the accident. The petitioner's arguments regarding false certification and testimony to evade insurance liability were rejected, and no cross-examination was permitted as the first respondent was unrepresented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case