SUNIL R M vs PVR CONMIX — 8095/2023
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020402232023
Filing Number
8028/2023
Filing Date
07-12-2023
Registration No
8095/2023
Registration Date
07-12-2023
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNIL R M
Adv. G.K. SHIVAPRAKASH
Respondent(s)
PVR CONMIX
IFFCO TOKIO GEN INS CO. LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 05-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In MVC No. 8095/2023, the court adjourned the hearing to 16-02-2026 for examination of the plaintiff's witness (PW-1) on oath. The plaintiff's counsel requested relief based on witness testimony and documentary evidence (insurance policy and Section 63 certificate under Indian Evidence Act, 2023), while the defendant's counsel opposed, contesting the admissibility of Exhibit 19 and alleging false testimony for compensation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In MVC No. 8095/2023, the court adjourned the hearing to 16-02-2026 for examination of the plaintiff's witness (PW-1) on oath. The plaintiff's counsel requested relief based on witness testimony and documentary evidence (insurance policy and Section 63 certificate under Indian Evidence Act, 2023), while the defendant's counsel opposed, contesting the admissibility of Exhibit 19 and alleging false testimony for compensation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts