REDDAMMA E vs DESETTI KAVERI — 7509/2025

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MVACT. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020390842025

Filing Number

7513/2025

Filing Date

15-Oct-2025

Registration No

7509/2025

Registration Date

15-Oct-2025

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

36-Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 166 Mv Act Section MVACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REDDAMMA E

    Adv. NAVEEN KUMAR N.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DESETTI KAVERI

  2. 2.NEW INDIA ASS CO LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 7509/2025 Summary: The National Lok-Adalath allowed petitioner Reddamma E's petition through a settlement agreement with respondent Desetti Kaveri (Respondent No.2) and New India Assurance Co Ltd. The parties agreed to settle the claim for Rs. 5,00,000 (Five Lakhs) as full and final settlement. Respondent No.2 was directed to pay the entire agreed amount to the petitioner via e-payment upon proper identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  5. 29-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  6. 16-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 15-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7509/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 7509/2025 Summary: The National Lok-Adalath allowed petitioner Reddamma E's petition through a settlement agreement with respondent Desetti Kaveri (Respondent No.2) and New India Assurance Co Ltd. The parties agreed to settle the claim for Rs. 5,00,000 (Five Lakhs) as full and final settlement. Respondent No.2 was directed to pay the entire agreed amount to the petitioner via e-payment upon proper identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case