NAGENDRA H R vs MOHAN KUMAR — 7947/2023
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020388942023
Filing Number
7884/2023
Filing Date
02-12-2023
Registration No
7947/2023
Registration Date
04-12-2023
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAGENDRA H R
Adv. ASMA KOUSAR
Respondent(s)
MOHAN KUMAR
SHILPA.M
Hearing History
Judge: 39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 28-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary In this Motor Vehicles Claim case (MVC 7947/2023) dated 25-02-2026, the court dismissed the applicant's petition. The first respondent's counsel argued that the applicant submitted false affidavits and fabricated documents (including medical bills worth ₹17,500 and medicine receipts) to avoid liability, while the applicant's counsel countered that the documents were genuine and denied submitting false evidence. The court found in favor of the first respondent and rejected the applicant's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this Motor Vehicles Claim case (MVC 7947/2023) dated 25-02-2026, the court dismissed the applicant's petition. The first respondent's counsel argued that the applicant submitted false affidavits and fabricated documents (including medical bills worth ₹17,500 and medicine receipts) to avoid liability, while the applicant's counsel countered that the documents were genuine and denied submitting false evidence. The court found in favor of the first respondent and rejected the applicant's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts