MALLIKARJUNA vs PREMKUMAR.R. — 3683/2023

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020385982022

ORDERS

Next Hearing

28th March 2026

Filing Number

7342/2022

Filing Date

26-12-2022

Registration No

3683/2023

Registration Date

13-06-2023

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

Acts & Sections

U/S 166 MV Act Section MV ACT

Petitioner(s)

MALLIKARJUNA

Adv. N.MANJUNATH

Respondent(s)

PREMKUMAR.R.

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GEN INS CO LTD

Hearing History

Judge: 39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

18-03-2026

ORDERS

12-03-2026

ORDERS

06-03-2026

HEARING

03-03-2026

HEARING

26-02-2026

OBJECTIONS

Interim Orders

10-02-2025
Deposition
26-03-2025
Issues
09-09-2025
Deposition
30-10-2025
Deposition
12-02-2026
Orders

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Bengaluru dismissed I.A.No.V filed by the insurance company Cholamandalam General Insurance Co. Ltd. seeking dismissal of the motor vehicle accident compensation petition on grounds of limitation. The court held that although the claim petition was filed 204 days after the 6-month statutory period under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act being beneficial legislation cannot deprive claimants of benefits on technical limitation grounds, citing Supreme Court directives in ICICI Lombard v. Ayiti Navaneetha. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Bengaluru dismissed I.A.No.V filed by the insurance company Cholamandalam General Insurance Co. Ltd. seeking dismissal of the motor vehicle accident compensation petition on grounds of limitation. The court held that although the claim petition was filed 204 days after the 6-month statutory period under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act being beneficial legislation cannot deprive claimants of benefits on technical limitation grounds, citing Supreme Court directives in ICICI Lombard v. Ayiti Navaneetha. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case