CHANNAPPA vs IFFCO TOKIO GEN INS CO. LTD Advocate - GURURAJ SALUR — 6706/2025
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020356742025
Filing Number
6709/2025
Filing Date
15-Sep-2025
Registration No
6706/2025
Registration Date
15-Sep-2025
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
35-Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANNAPPA
Adv. SHANKAR PRASAD M.B
Respondent(s)
-
1.IFFCO TOKIO GEN INS CO. LTD Advocate - GURURAJ SALUR
-
2.NATARAJU S T
Adv. K B TEJESH
Case History
-
25-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary In MVC No. 6706 of 2025, the Small Causes Court (Bengaluru) adjourned the case to 06.03.2026 for examination of PW1. The court admitted documentary evidence including a notice under IPC Section 133 (marked as EP.14), an injury certificate (EP.15), and X-ray films (EP.16). The matter was further adjourned for cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Jan-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Dec-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Nov-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
23-Oct-2025
Summons
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
16-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6706/2025
Case Summary In MVC No. 6706 of 2025, the Small Causes Court (Bengaluru) adjourned the case to 06.03.2026 for examination of PW1. The court admitted documentary evidence including a notice under IPC Section 133 (marked as EP.14), an injury certificate (EP.15), and X-ray films (EP.16). The matter was further adjourned for cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts