BHIMEGOWDA vs SANAULLA Advocate - K.R.NAGARAJA — 6340/2023
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MVACT. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020293172023
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
6272/2023
Filing Date
25-09-2023
Registration No
6340/2023
Registration Date
25-09-2023
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHIMEGOWDA
Adv. MANJUNATH N
Respondent(s)
SANAULLA Advocate - K.R.NAGARAJA
UNIVERSAL SAMPO GEN INS CO LTD
Adv. MADHU KIRAN
Hearing History
Judge: 38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
ORDERS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 09-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 18-02-2026 | evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This document records the cross-examination and re-examination testimony of witness PW-2 (a medical professional) in Motor Vehicle Case MVC 6340/2023 before the II Additional Judge on 08.01.2026. The witness testified regarding the petitioner's hip fracture treatment, disability assessment (45% lower limb disability), medical expenses (Rs. 60,000), and follow-up records, denying suggestions that the testimony was false or fabricated to assist the petitioner. No final order or ruling is provided in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This document records the cross-examination and re-examination testimony of witness PW-2 (a medical professional) in Motor Vehicle Case MVC 6340/2023 before the II Additional Judge on 08.01.2026. The witness testified regarding the petitioner's hip fracture treatment, disability assessment (45% lower limb disability), medical expenses (Rs. 60,000), and follow-up records, denying suggestions that the testimony was false or fabricated to assist the petitioner. No final order or ruling is provided in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts