LEELAVATHI.P. vs HARISHA D.S. — 5042/2022
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MVACT. Status: OBJECTIONS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020277722022
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
5042/2022
Filing Date
19-09-2022
Registration No
5042/2022
Registration Date
19-09-2022
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LEELAVATHI.P.
Adv. D.G.MANJUNATH
Respondent(s)
HARISHA D.S.
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INS CO LTD.,
Adv. KIRAN PUJAR
KAVYA SHREE T D/O THYAGARAJ B K,
THE NEW INDIA ASSRENCE COMPANY LIMITED,
Hearing History
Judge: 38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
OBJECTIONS
evidence
evidence
evidence
evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
| 06-03-2026 | evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | evidence |
Interim Orders
This document records witness examination in motor vehicle cases (MVC-5042/2022 and MVC-5043/2022) before the II Additional Judge on 23.12.2025. Witness PW-6 filed an affidavit in chief and underwent cross-examination by the respondent's advocate regarding an accident involving a car (KA02-MJ-0051) and alleged lorry, with disputes over whether the witness was an eye witness versus mahazar witness and responsibility for the accident. The document is incomplete and contains only the examination record without a final court order or verdict. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records witness examination in motor vehicle cases (MVC-5042/2022 and MVC-5043/2022) before the II Additional Judge on 23.12.2025. Witness PW-6 filed an affidavit in chief and underwent cross-examination by the respondent's advocate regarding an accident involving a car (KA02-MJ-0051) and alleged lorry, with disputes over whether the witness was an eye witness versus mahazar witness and responsibility for the accident. The document is incomplete and contains only the examination record without a final court order or verdict. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts