ZAIBUNNISA vs NOORULLA SHRIFF — 8309/2021
Case under -U/s 200 of Cr.p.c. R/w Sec 138 of Ni Act Section CRPC. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
C.C - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABC020244402021
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
8309/2021
Filing Date
17-09-2021
Registration No
8309/2021
Registration Date
17-09-2021
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
36-SCCH - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
FIR Details
Police Station
CHAMARAJPET PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ZAIBUNNISA
Adv. SYED AKBER PASH
Respondent(s)
NOORULLA SHRIFF
Hearing History
Judge: 36-SCCH - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
evidence
evidence
evidence
evidence
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | evidence |
| 29-04-2026 | evidence |
| 04-04-2026 | evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | evidence |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 8309/2021 - Zaibunnisa v. Noorulla Shriff Hearing Date: March 3, 2025 Outcome: Case adjourned for continuation of cross-examination of the petitioner (Zaibunnisa, PW.1). The opposing counsel requested additional time to complete their cross-examination, which was granted by the court. Key Issue: The case involves disputed financial transactions, including allegations regarding Rs. 10 lakhs allegedly given by the petitioner to the respondent (referred to as "ARP") for Hajj travel arrangements in 2019, along with issues concerning receipts, bank accounts, check payments, and signature discrepancies on submitted documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 8309/2021 - Zaibunnisa v. Noorulla Shriff Hearing Date: March 3, 2025 Outcome: Case adjourned for continuation of cross-examination of the petitioner (Zaibunnisa, PW.1). The opposing counsel requested additional time to complete their cross-examination, which was granted by the court. Key Issue: The case involves disputed financial transactions, including allegations regarding Rs. 10 lakhs allegedly given by the petitioner to the respondent (referred to as "ARP") for Hajj travel arrangements in 2019, along with issues concerning receipts, bank accounts, check payments, and signature discrepancies on submitted documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts