PAVITHRA R vs RAMESH K. — 4435/2022

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020244362022

evidence

Next Hearing

26th March 2026

Filing Number

4434/2022

Filing Date

20-08-2022

Registration No

4435/2022

Registration Date

20-08-2022

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

Acts & Sections

U/S 166 MV Act Section MV ACT

Petitioner(s)

PAVITHRA R

Adv. N.MANJUNATH

Respondent(s)

RAMESH K.

HDFC ERGO GENERAL INS CO LTD.,

Hearing History

Judge: 39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

06-03-2026

evidence

27-02-2026

evidence

13-02-2026

evidence

30-01-2026

evidence

12-01-2026

evidence

Interim Orders

05-02-2024
Deposition
21-01-2025

Deposition

21-01-2025

Deposition

21-01-2025

Deposition

04-02-2025
Deposition
11-02-2025
Issues
10-06-2025
Deposition
19-12-2025
Deposition
27-02-2026
Deposition
27-02-2026
Deposition

Summary This is a Motor Vehicle Accident (MVC) case (No. 4436/2022 with 4435/2022) heard by a Bengaluru court on 27-02-2026. The court examined medical evidence through expert testimony regarding injuries sustained by the petitioner, including bone fractures in the leg (tibia and fibula), treatment details, and recovery status. The court's detailed examination of witness statements confirmed the nature and extent of injuries, treatment provided, and the petitioner's current medical condition, ultimately addressing liability and compensation claims in this accident case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Motor Vehicle Accident (MVC) case (No. 4436/2022 with 4435/2022) heard by a Bengaluru court on 27-02-2026. The court examined medical evidence through expert testimony regarding injuries sustained by the petitioner, including bone fractures in the leg (tibia and fibula), treatment details, and recovery status. The court's detailed examination of witness statements confirmed the nature and extent of injuries, treatment provided, and the petitioner's current medical condition, ultimately addressing liability and compensation claims in this accident case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case