RAMBHAJAN vs SIDDARAJU H S — 4509/2025
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020244182025
Filing Number
4514/2025
Filing Date
26-Jun-2025
Registration No
4509/2025
Registration Date
26-Jun-2025
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
36-Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMBHAJAN
Adv. KUMARA K B
Respondent(s)
-
1.SIDDARAJU H S
-
2.TATA AIG GEN INS CO LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 4509/2025 - Summary: The National Lok-Adalath allowed petitioner Rambhajan's petition through settlement on 14.03.2026. The petitioner and respondent No.2 (Siddaraju H S) jointly agreed to settle the claim for Rs. 4,75,000 as full and final compensation. The court verified the petitioner's identity via Aadhaar card, found the settlement lawful and non-violative of public policy, and directed respondent No.2 to pay the entire agreed amount to the petitioner through e-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
-
23-Feb-2026
Summons
Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
-
10-Feb-2026
Summons
Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
-
11-Nov-2025
Summons
Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
-
08-Sep-2025
Summons
Scch - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm
-
27-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4509/2025
Case 4509/2025 - Summary: The National Lok-Adalath allowed petitioner Rambhajan's petition through settlement on 14.03.2026. The petitioner and respondent No.2 (Siddaraju H S) jointly agreed to settle the claim for Rs. 4,75,000 as full and final compensation. The court verified the petitioner's identity via Aadhaar card, found the settlement lawful and non-violative of public policy, and directed respondent No.2 to pay the entire agreed amount to the petitioner through e-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts