PARAMESH B R vs ANAND KUMAR P S — 4791/2023

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

evidence Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020215372023

Filing Number

4725/2023

Filing Date

22-Jul-2023

Registration No

4791/2023

Registration Date

22-Jul-2023

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

39-Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAMESH B R

    Adv. R CHANDRASHEKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANAND KUMAR P S

  2. 2.SHRI RAM GEN INS CO LTD

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Settlement

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  8. 14-Jan-2026

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  9. 13-Dec-2025

    Settlement

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Settlement

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  12. 25-Oct-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  13. 10-Oct-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  14. 20-Sep-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  15. 23-Aug-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  16. 31-Jul-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  17. 12-Jul-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  18. 03-Jun-2025

    Settlement

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  19. 05-May-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  20. 05-Apr-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  21. 24-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 24-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 4791/2023 Petitioner: Paramesh B R Respondent: Anand Kumar P S and Shri Ram Gen Ins Co Ltd The court heard arguments regarding medical billing disputes. The petitioner's counsel presented evidence including authority documents and final bills, seeking relief on the grounds that the petitioner was not issued final bills despite treatment. The respondent's counsel disputed this, stating the hospital had discount policies and explained discrepancies in billing nomenclature (corporate vs. standard rates). The first respondent failed to appear or provide representation. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 24-Mar-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  24. 05-Mar-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  25. 20-Feb-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  26. 30-Jan-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  27. 30-Jan-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  28. 08-Jan-2025

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  29. 13-Dec-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  30. 12-Nov-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  31. 23-Sep-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  32. 29-Aug-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  33. 05-Aug-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  34. 23-Jul-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  35. 10-Jul-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  36. 10-Jul-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  37. 03-Jul-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  38. 11-Jun-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  39. 15-Mar-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  40. 07-Feb-2024

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  41. 28-Dec-2023

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  42. 22-Nov-2023

    IssuesView PDF

  43. 22-Nov-2023

    evidence

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  44. 21-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  45. 19-Oct-2023

    Summons

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  46. 19-Sep-2023

    Summons

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  47. 05-Aug-2023

    Summons

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  48. 26-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 22-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4791/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 4791/2023 Petitioner: Paramesh B R Respondent: Anand Kumar P S and Shri Ram Gen Ins Co Ltd The court heard arguments regarding medical billing disputes. The petitioner's counsel presented evidence including authority documents and final bills, seeking relief on the grounds that the petitioner was not issued final bills despite treatment. The respondent's counsel disputed this, stating the hospital had discount policies and explained discrepancies in billing nomenclature (corporate vs. standard rates). The first respondent failed to appear or provide representation. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case