SAYED FARHAN MAKKI vs SOUTHERN CARGO LOGISTICS PVT LTD — 3235/2024
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MVACT. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020212012024
Filing Number
3215/2024
Filing Date
03-05-2024
Registration No
3235/2024
Registration Date
04-05-2024
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAYED FARHAN MAKKI
Adv. B C VINODA
Respondent(s)
SOUTHERN CARGO LOGISTICS PVT LTD
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Disposed
evidence
evidence
evidence
evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | evidence |
| 24-12-2025 | evidence |
| 12-12-2025 | evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 3235/2024 Summary: The Lok Adalath bench approved a settlement between petitioner Sayed Farhan Makki and respondent Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd for Rs. 2,00,000. The court found the joint settlement memo lawful and reasonable, ordering the respondent to deposit the compensation within 3 months or face 6% per annum interest, with subsequent release to the petitioner via e-payment after verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 3235/2024 Summary: The Lok Adalath bench approved a settlement between petitioner Sayed Farhan Makki and respondent Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd for Rs. 2,00,000. The court found the joint settlement memo lawful and reasonable, ordering the respondent to deposit the compensation within 3 months or face 6% per annum interest, with subsequent release to the petitioner via e-payment after verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts