SATHEESHA .R. vs HAMSALEKHA — 4320/2023
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020190162023
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
4261/2023
Filing Date
04-07-2023
Registration No
4320/2023
Registration Date
05-07-2023
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATHEESHA .R.
Adv. ANIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
HAMSALEKHA
GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED
Adv. V R MURALIDHARA
Hearing History
Judge: 38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
evidence
ARGUMENTS
evidence
evidence
evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | evidence |
Interim Orders
This document records the examination and cross-examination of a medical witness (PW-2) in Motor Vehicles Case No. 4320/2023 before the II Additional Judge on 22.12.2025. The witness testified regarding the petitioner's left upper limb fracture, confirming the fracture is united with no complications, 25% shoulder joint restriction, and assessed disability at 34% for the left upper limb and 12% for the whole body, while denying allegations of incompetence or false deposition. The case proceedings are ongoing with testimony recorded; no final order or adjournment decision is stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the examination and cross-examination of a medical witness (PW-2) in Motor Vehicles Case No. 4320/2023 before the II Additional Judge on 22.12.2025. The witness testified regarding the petitioner's left upper limb fracture, confirming the fracture is united with no complications, 25% shoulder joint restriction, and assessed disability at 34% for the left upper limb and 12% for the whole body, while denying allegations of incompetence or false deposition. The case proceedings are ongoing with testimony recorded; no final order or adjournment decision is stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts