PARVATHAMMA vs HDFC ERGO GENERAL INS CO LTD., — 2841/2025
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR on 16th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020166222025
Filing Number
2847/2025
Filing Date
28-04-2025
Registration No
2841/2025
Registration Date
28-04-2025
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARVATHAMMA
Adv. SACHIN V SHETTAR
JAGADEESH
PADMA
RADHA H V
Respondent(s)
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INS CO LTD.,
MOHAMMED NUMAN ULLA
Hearing History
Judge: 38-SCCH - 13 - II ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Disposed
Settlement
Settlement
OBJECTIONS
OBJECTIONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Settlement |
| 16-02-2026 | Settlement |
| 09-01-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
| 12-12-2025 | OBJECTIONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore allowed the petitioners' claim by settling the matter through a joint memo filed by the parties. Respondent No. 3 agreed to pay Rs. 15,70,000 as full and final settlement, with no costs awarded to the petitioner. The respondent was directed to deposit the compensation amount before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore allowed the petitioners' claim by settling the matter through a joint memo filed by the parties. Respondent No. 3 agreed to pay Rs. 15,70,000 as full and final settlement, with no costs awarded to the petitioner. The respondent was directed to deposit the compensation amount before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts