JYOTHI T S vs SHASHIDHARA S — 2740/2025
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020158722025
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
2742/2025
Filing Date
24-04-2025
Registration No
2740/2025
Registration Date
24-04-2025
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
35-SCCH -01 - CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JYOTHI T S
Adv. GIRISH
DEEKSHITHA M M
MADHUSUDHAN B M
YASHODAMMA
Respondent(s)
SHASHIDHARA S
LIBERTY GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 35-SCCH -01 - CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
evidence
evidence
Settlement
HEARING
evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | evidence |
| 07-03-2026 | Settlement |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-02-2026 | evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: MVC No. 2740/2025 On 20.12.2025, the court examined witness PW1 (the claimant's wife) under cross-examination by the insurance company's counsel. The witness testified regarding a motor vehicle accident where her husband sustained injuries and died. Key aspects addressed included: accident circumstances, lack of driving license, helmet usage, insurance policy details, medical reports, and income documentation. The court recorded the witness's testimony addressing multiple factual claims regarding the incident and resulting damages. No cross-examination was conducted by the first respondent's counsel due to their absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: MVC No. 2740/2025 On 20.12.2025, the court examined witness PW1 (the claimant's wife) under cross-examination by the insurance company's counsel. The witness testified regarding a motor vehicle accident where her husband sustained injuries and died. Key aspects addressed included: accident circumstances, lack of driving license, helmet usage, insurance policy details, medical reports, and income documentation. The court recorded the witness's testimony addressing multiple factual claims regarding the incident and resulting damages. No cross-examination was conducted by the first respondent's counsel due to their absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts