BABU K vs DAVANAM JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - KRUPA B N — 2436/2025
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020141832025
Filing Number
2436/2025
Filing Date
09-Apr-2025
Registration No
2436/2025
Registration Date
11-Apr-2025
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
35-Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABU K
Adv. SHANKAR A.C
Respondent(s)
-
1.DAVANAM JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - KRUPA B N
-
2.TATA AIG GEN INS CO LTD
Adv. H K RAMAMURTHY
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Mar-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
11-Mar-2026
Settlement
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
10-Mar-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
23-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
CASE SUMMARY - MVC No. 2436/2025 This is a Motor Vehicle Compensation case heard on 23.02.2026 in Bengaluru's Small Cases Court. Petitioner Babu K testified as PW1 (first witness) regarding an auto-rickshaw accident on 30.01.2025 while traveling to M.S. Ramaiah Hospital for kidney treatment. During cross-examination by the insurance company's advocate, the witness was confronted with multiple contradictions in his testimony, including inconsistencies regarding medical bills, prior employment, fabricated documents marked "N.P.20," and conflicting statements about the accident's circumstances. The court recorded 16 points of contradictory statements. The first respondent's advocate did not cross-examine as they were absent. No re-examination was conducted. The case appears to remain pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Feb-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
30-Jan-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Jan-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Jan-2026
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
19-Dec-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
05-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
05-Dec-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
21-Nov-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
11-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Oct-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
09-Sep-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
05-Aug-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
11-Jul-2025
evidence
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
24-Jun-2025
Summons
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
03-Jun-2025
Summons
Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes
-
15-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2436/2025
CASE SUMMARY - MVC No. 2436/2025 This is a Motor Vehicle Compensation case heard on 23.02.2026 in Bengaluru's Small Cases Court. Petitioner Babu K testified as PW1 (first witness) regarding an auto-rickshaw accident on 30.01.2025 while traveling to M.S. Ramaiah Hospital for kidney treatment. During cross-examination by the insurance company's advocate, the witness was confronted with multiple contradictions in his testimony, including inconsistencies regarding medical bills, prior employment, fabricated documents marked "N.P.20," and conflicting statements about the accident's circumstances. The court recorded 16 points of contradictory statements. The first respondent's advocate did not cross-examine as they were absent. No re-examination was conducted. The case appears to remain pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts