CHAITRASRI K J vs GURUSWAMY H M Advocate - B S NAGARAJ — 2391/2025

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

evidence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020139612025

Filing Number

2391/2025

Filing Date

09-Apr-2025

Registration No

2391/2025

Registration Date

09-Apr-2025

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

35-Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAITRASRI K J

    Adv. PARAMESHA K.N

  2. 2.HARSHITH GOWDA .G

  3. 3.HRUTHIK GOWDA .K

  4. 4.JAYAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURUSWAMY H M Advocate - B S NAGARAJ

  2. 2.IFFCO TOKIO GEN INS CO. LTD

    Adv. KRISHNA SHEERNALI

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Settlement

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    This is a Motor Vehicles Claim case (MVC No. 2391/2025) heard on 11.02.2026 involving a fatal two-wheeler accident. The document records cross-examination of PW1 (the deceased's widow) by the insurance company's advocate, where she denies or clarifies several allegations: she did not witness the accident, her husband was not wearing a helmet, she cannot confirm he was overtaking another vehicle, and she denies giving false evidence solely to obtain higher compensation. The case concerns a claim for death benefits from IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company. No final order/judgment is provided in this excerpt—only the witness examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  8. 30-Dec-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  10. 29-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 29-Nov-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  12. 21-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 21-Nov-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  14. 13-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  16. 30-Oct-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  17. 18-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 18-Oct-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  19. 26-Sep-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  20. 10-Sep-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  21. 12-Aug-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  22. 18-Jul-2025

    IssuesView PDF

  23. 18-Jul-2025

    evidence

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  24. 16-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  25. 01-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  26. 23-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  27. 03-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Scch -01 - Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes

  28. 15-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 09-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2391/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Motor Vehicles Claim case (MVC No. 2391/2025) heard on 11.02.2026 involving a fatal two-wheeler accident. The document records cross-examination of PW1 (the deceased's widow) by the insurance company's advocate, where she denies or clarifies several allegations: she did not witness the accident, her husband was not wearing a helmet, she cannot confirm he was overtaking another vehicle, and she denies giving false evidence solely to obtain higher compensation. The case concerns a claim for death benefits from IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company. No final order/judgment is provided in this excerpt—only the witness examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case