CHAITRASRI K J vs GURUSWAMY H M Advocate - B S NAGARAJ — 2391/2025
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020139612025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
2391/2025
Filing Date
09-04-2025
Registration No
2391/2025
Registration Date
09-04-2025
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
35-SCCH -01 - CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAITRASRI K J
Adv. PARAMESHA K.N
HARSHITH GOWDA .G
HRUTHIK GOWDA .K
JAYAMMA
Respondent(s)
GURUSWAMY H M Advocate - B S NAGARAJ
IFFCO TOKIO GEN INS CO. LTD
Adv. KRISHNA SHEERNALI
Hearing History
Judge: 35-SCCH -01 - CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
evidence
evidence
Settlement
evidence
evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Settlement |
| 11-02-2026 | evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a Motor Vehicles Claim case (MVC No. 2391/2025) heard on 11.02.2026 involving a fatal two-wheeler accident. The document records cross-examination of PW1 (the deceased's widow) by the insurance company's advocate, where she denies or clarifies several allegations: she did not witness the accident, her husband was not wearing a helmet, she cannot confirm he was overtaking another vehicle, and she denies giving false evidence solely to obtain higher compensation. The case concerns a claim for death benefits from IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company. No final order/judgment is provided in this excerpt—only the witness examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Motor Vehicles Claim case (MVC No. 2391/2025) heard on 11.02.2026 involving a fatal two-wheeler accident. The document records cross-examination of PW1 (the deceased's widow) by the insurance company's advocate, where she denies or clarifies several allegations: she did not witness the accident, her husband was not wearing a helmet, she cannot confirm he was overtaking another vehicle, and she denies giving false evidence solely to obtain higher compensation. The case concerns a claim for death benefits from IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company. No final order/judgment is provided in this excerpt—only the witness examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts