ANU BALAJI. vs K.V. SATHYANARAYANA BABU — 3941/2023
Case under -U/s 200 of Cr.p.c. R/w Sec 138 of Ni Act Section CRPC. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
C.C - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABC020131792023
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
3941/2023
Filing Date
16-05-2023
Registration No
3941/2023
Registration Date
16-05-2023
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
36-SCCH - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANU BALAJI.
Adv. K.P VISHWANATH
Respondent(s)
K.V. SATHYANARAYANA BABU
Hearing History
Judge: 36-SCCH - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
evidence
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
Settlement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 28-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 14-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 21-02-2026 | Settlement |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 3941/2023 The Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru allowed complainant Anu Balaji's application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C to recall PW.1 (the GPA holder) for further chief examination. The complainant sought to produce an unregistered indenture of mutual confirmation, assurance and undertaking executed by accused K.V. Sathyanarayana Babu, which was unavailable earlier as it was held by the complainant outside India. The accused objected, claiming the document was insufficiently stamped and the application was dilatory. The court found the application justified, applying precedent that unregistered documents need not be subject to stamp duty/penalty requirements before admission, and permitted further evidence for proper adjudication. The accused retained the right to cross-examine PW.1 on the document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 3941/2023 The Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru allowed complainant Anu Balaji's application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C to recall PW.1 (the GPA holder) for further chief examination. The complainant sought to produce an unregistered indenture of mutual confirmation, assurance and undertaking executed by accused K.V. Sathyanarayana Babu, which was unavailable earlier as it was held by the complainant outside India. The accused objected, claiming the document was insufficiently stamped and the application was dilatory. The court found the application justified, applying precedent that unregistered documents need not be subject to stamp duty/penalty requirements before admission, and permitted further evidence for proper adjudication. The accused retained the right to cross-examine PW.1 on the document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts