ANU BALAJI. vs K.V. SATHYANARAYANA BABU — 3941/2023

Case under -U/s 200 of Cr.p.c. R/w Sec 138 of Ni Act Section CRPC. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

C.C - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABC020131792023

evidence

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

3941/2023

Filing Date

16-05-2023

Registration No

3941/2023

Registration Date

16-05-2023

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

36-SCCH - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

Acts & Sections

-U/s 200 of Cr.p.c. R/w Sec 138 of Ni Act Section CRPC

Petitioner(s)

ANU BALAJI.

Adv. K.P VISHWANATH

Respondent(s)

K.V. SATHYANARAYANA BABU

Hearing History

Judge: 36-SCCH - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

13-05-2026

evidence

10-04-2026

ORDERS

28-03-2026

HEARING

14-03-2026

HEARING

21-02-2026

Settlement

Interim Orders

02-12-2024
Orders
13-05-2026
Orders

Case Summary: CC 3941/2023 The Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru allowed complainant Anu Balaji's application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C to recall PW.1 (the GPA holder) for further chief examination. The complainant sought to produce an unregistered indenture of mutual confirmation, assurance and undertaking executed by accused K.V. Sathyanarayana Babu, which was unavailable earlier as it was held by the complainant outside India. The accused objected, claiming the document was insufficiently stamped and the application was dilatory. The court found the application justified, applying precedent that unregistered documents need not be subject to stamp duty/penalty requirements before admission, and permitted further evidence for proper adjudication. The accused retained the right to cross-examine PW.1 on the document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 3941/2023 The Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru allowed complainant Anu Balaji's application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C to recall PW.1 (the GPA holder) for further chief examination. The complainant sought to produce an unregistered indenture of mutual confirmation, assurance and undertaking executed by accused K.V. Sathyanarayana Babu, which was unavailable earlier as it was held by the complainant outside India. The accused objected, claiming the document was insufficiently stamped and the application was dilatory. The court found the application justified, applying precedent that unregistered documents need not be subject to stamp duty/penalty requirements before admission, and permitted further evidence for proper adjudication. The accused retained the right to cross-examine PW.1 on the document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case