K.N. GOWDRU PROVISION STORES vs APARNA.D. — 1497/2020
Case under -u/s 200 of Cr.p.c. R/w Sec 138 of Ni Act Section CRPC. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
C.C - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABC020057312020
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
1497/2020
Filing Date
28-02-2020
Registration No
1497/2020
Registration Date
28-02-2020
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
36-SCCH - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.N. GOWDRU PROVISION STORES
Adv. C CHANNEGOWDA
Respondent(s)
APARNA.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 36-SCCH - 09 - Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
evidence
evidence
evidence
evidence
evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | evidence |
| 07-01-2026 | evidence |
| 05-12-2025 | evidence |
| 12-11-2025 | evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this Small Causes Court case (CC No. 1497/2020) from Bengaluru, the court examined witness testimony regarding alleged cheque fraud and unauthorized supply of goods worth Rs. 1,26,500. The witness's testimony was found to contain significant inconsistencies and lacks corroboration—the witness could not identify the building owner where goods were allegedly delivered, provided vague details about subsequent cheques, and had no knowledge of key facts. The court found the cross-examination revealed serious credibility issues with the prosecution's case. No further cross-examination was permitted, and the order noted the case record was digitally signed on 07.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this Small Causes Court case (CC No. 1497/2020) from Bengaluru, the court examined witness testimony regarding alleged cheque fraud and unauthorized supply of goods worth Rs. 1,26,500. The witness's testimony was found to contain significant inconsistencies and lacks corroboration—the witness could not identify the building owner where goods were allegedly delivered, provided vague details about subsequent cheques, and had no knowledge of key facts. The court found the cross-examination revealed serious credibility issues with the prosecution's case. No further cross-examination was permitted, and the order noted the case record was digitally signed on 07.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts