GANGAMMA vs VENKATESHA.D. — 3150/2023

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020049072023

evidence

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

1007/2023

Filing Date

16-02-2023

Registration No

3150/2023

Registration Date

27-05-2023

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

37-SCCH - 11 - I ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

Acts & Sections

U/S 166 MV Act Section MV ACT

Petitioner(s)

GANGAMMA

Adv. B.B.PATIL

Respondent(s)

VENKATESHA.D.

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GEN INS CO LTD

Hearing History

Judge: 37-SCCH - 11 - I ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM

16-03-2026

evidence

06-03-2026

evidence

27-02-2026

evidence

24-02-2026

evidence

18-02-2026

evidence

Interim Orders

02-08-2024
Issues
04-08-2025
Orders
26-11-2025
Deposition
12-12-2025
Deposition
05-01-2026
Deposition
05-02-2026
Deposition
18-02-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
16-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: 3150/2023 Date: 16.03.2026 Outcome: The case was adjourned for further hearing. A witness was examined and sworn in on 16.03.2026. The court heard arguments from all three parties through their respective counsel. Documentary evidence (Aadhar card notarized copy and original documents) was produced and marked as exhibits. The first defendant's counsel was absent, so their party challenge was postponed. The matter is scheduled for continuation before the Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Bengaluru, with further proceedings to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: 3150/2023 Date: 16.03.2026 Outcome: The case was adjourned for further hearing. A witness was examined and sworn in on 16.03.2026. The court heard arguments from all three parties through their respective counsel. Documentary evidence (Aadhar card notarized copy and original documents) was produced and marked as exhibits. The first defendant's counsel was absent, so their party challenge was postponed. The matter is scheduled for continuation before the Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Bengaluru, with further proceedings to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case