MANASI RANJITH. NAYAK vs SARBAR KHAN — 755/2022
Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Status: evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KABC020040822022
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
784/2022
Filing Date
09-02-2022
Registration No
755/2022
Registration Date
09-02-2022
Court
CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU
Judge
39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANASI RANJITH. NAYAK
Adv. MANJUNATH
Respondent(s)
SARBAR KHAN
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INS CO LTD.,
Hearing History
Judge: 39-SCCH - 18 - III ADDL. Judge, Court of Small Causes and ACJM
evidence
ARGUMENTS
evidence
evidence
evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No: MVC 755/2022 | Court: SCCH 18 | Dated: 06-03-2026 This is a motor vehicle accident compensation case (PW-2 examination). The court heard cross-examination of a plastic surgeon (expert witness for the defendant) who challenged the petitioner's medical certificate regarding disability assessment. The defendant's counsel argued the witness lacked relevant expertise, that internal injuries were absent, and questioned the disability percentage (26.82%) and treatment cost estimates (₹1,00,000-₹1,50,000) claimed in the medical report. The defendant was noted as ex-parte (unrepresented). The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no re-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No: MVC 755/2022 | Court: SCCH 18 | Dated: 06-03-2026 This is a motor vehicle accident compensation case (PW-2 examination). The court heard cross-examination of a plastic surgeon (expert witness for the defendant) who challenged the petitioner's medical certificate regarding disability assessment. The defendant's counsel argued the witness lacked relevant expertise, that internal injuries were absent, and questioned the disability percentage (26.82%) and treatment cost estimates (₹1,00,000-₹1,50,000) claimed in the medical report. The defendant was noted as ex-parte (unrepresented). The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no re-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts