SATHIGAMMA vs DILEEPA H G — 375/2026

Case under U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KABC020013492026

Filing Number

378/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

375/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU

Judge

39-Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 166 Mv Act Section MV ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATHIGAMMA

    Adv. VINOD N

  2. 2.DIVYA C M

  3. 3.SUMANTH S M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DILEEPA H G

  2. 2.IFFCO TOKIO GEN INS CO. LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 375/2026 Summary The Lok-Adalath accepted a voluntary settlement between petitioners Sathigamma, Divya C M, and Sumanth S M and respondent Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company for Rs. 21,00,000. The insurance company was directed to deposit this amount within two months, with compensation distributed as: Petitioner No. 1 (Rs. 11,00,000), Petitioner No. 2 (Rs. 5,00,000), and Petitioner No. 3 (Rs. 5,00,000), with 70% of Petitioner No. 1's share released immediately and 30% held in a nationalized bank for three years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Scch - 18 - III Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Acjm

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 375/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 375/2026 Summary The Lok-Adalath accepted a voluntary settlement between petitioners Sathigamma, Divya C M, and Sumanth S M and respondent Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company for Rs. 21,00,000. The insurance company was directed to deposit this amount within two months, with compensation distributed as: Petitioner No. 1 (Rs. 11,00,000), Petitioner No. 2 (Rs. 5,00,000), and Petitioner No. 3 (Rs. 5,00,000), with 70% of Petitioner No. 1's share released immediately and 30% held in a nationalized bank for three years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case