RATHNAMMA N vs THE MANAGING COMMITTEE JAMIYA MOSQUE — 8356/2025

Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABC010308512025

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

8352/2025

Filing Date

27-11-2025

Registration No

8356/2025

Registration Date

27-11-2025

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

4-CCH25 III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

U/o Vii Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

RATHNAMMA N

Adv. SHANKRAPPA

Respondent(s)

THE MANAGING COMMITTEE JAMIYA MOSQUE

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CCH25 III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

13-03-2026

SUMMONS

06-03-2026

SUMMONS

19-02-2026

SUMMONS

19-01-2026

OBJECTION

16-12-2025

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

01-12-2025
Orders

Summary: In O.S.No.8356/2025, the court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendant, its representatives, and anyone claiming through the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's lawful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule properties. The court found a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff based on her registered sale deed dated 02.05.2002 and supporting documents proving possession and payment of property taxes. The case is adjourned to 16.12.2025 for next hearing, and the plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3-A provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S.No.8356/2025, the court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendant, its representatives, and anyone claiming through the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's lawful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule properties. The court found a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff based on her registered sale deed dated 02.05.2002 and supporting documents proving possession and payment of property taxes. The case is adjourned to 16.12.2025 for next hearing, and the plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3-A provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case