LEELAVATHI G vs THE COMMISSIONER, BBMP — 7932/2024

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABC010287682024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

Filing Number

7940/2024

Filing Date

11-11-2024

Registration No

7932/2024

Registration Date

11-11-2024

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

4-CCH25 III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

LEELAVATHI G

Adv. Viswanatha N S

Respondent(s)

THE COMMISSIONER, BBMP

THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER BBMP

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,BBMP

VENKATARAMANA B

VENKATASUBBAMMA B

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CCH25 III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-03-2026

ORDERS

19-02-2026

HEARING

10-02-2026

HEARING

09-02-2026

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

17-06-2025
Orders
04-07-2025
Issue

This document is an order from the III Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore (O.S. No. 7932/2024) dated July 4, 2025, in which the court has framed issues in the civil suit filed by Leelavathi G. against the Chief Commissioner of BBMP and others regarding alleged illegal construction by Defendants 4 and 5 on the eastern side of the plaintiff's property. The four issues relate to whether the plaintiff can prove illegal construction liable for removal, whether the construction blocks easementary rights of air and light, whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief sought, and what decree should be passed. The case has been set for further proceedings to address these framed issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is an order from the III Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore (O.S. No. 7932/2024) dated July 4, 2025, in which the court has framed issues in the civil suit filed by Leelavathi G. against the Chief Commissioner of BBMP and others regarding alleged illegal construction by Defendants 4 and 5 on the eastern side of the plaintiff's property. The four issues relate to whether the plaintiff can prove illegal construction liable for removal, whether the construction blocks easementary rights of air and light, whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief sought, and what decree should be passed. The case has been set for further proceedings to address these framed issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case