LEELAVATHI G vs THE COMMISSIONER, BBMP — 7932/2024
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABC010287682024
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
7940/2024
Filing Date
11-11-2024
Registration No
7932/2024
Registration Date
11-11-2024
Court
PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Judge
4-CCH25 III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LEELAVATHI G
Adv. Viswanatha N S
Respondent(s)
THE COMMISSIONER, BBMP
THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER BBMP
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,BBMP
VENKATARAMANA B
VENKATASUBBAMMA B
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CCH25 III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 19-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
This document is an order from the III Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore (O.S. No. 7932/2024) dated July 4, 2025, in which the court has framed issues in the civil suit filed by Leelavathi G. against the Chief Commissioner of BBMP and others regarding alleged illegal construction by Defendants 4 and 5 on the eastern side of the plaintiff's property. The four issues relate to whether the plaintiff can prove illegal construction liable for removal, whether the construction blocks easementary rights of air and light, whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief sought, and what decree should be passed. The case has been set for further proceedings to address these framed issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is an order from the III Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore (O.S. No. 7932/2024) dated July 4, 2025, in which the court has framed issues in the civil suit filed by Leelavathi G. against the Chief Commissioner of BBMP and others regarding alleged illegal construction by Defendants 4 and 5 on the eastern side of the plaintiff's property. The four issues relate to whether the plaintiff can prove illegal construction liable for removal, whether the construction blocks easementary rights of air and light, whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief sought, and what decree should be passed. The case has been set for further proceedings to address these framed issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts