ASIYA BI vs MOHAMMED FAZAL — 6921/2021

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Objection Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABC010283152021

Filing Number

6813/2021

Filing Date

18-Dec-2021

Registration No

6921/2021

Registration Date

18-Dec-2021

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

2-Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASIYA BI

    Adv. KOTHWAL R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED FAZAL

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  3. 05-Feb-2026

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  7. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  8. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  9. 29-Jul-2025

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  10. 22-Jul-2025

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  11. 27-Jun-2025

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  12. 25-Apr-2025

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  13. 19-Mar-2025

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  14. 04-Mar-2025

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  15. 27-Jan-2025

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  16. 27-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  17. 24-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  18. 31-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  19. 19-Jul-2024

    Summons

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  20. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  21. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  22. 03-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  23. 20-Dec-2023

    Objection

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  24. 06-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  25. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  26. 02-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  27. 04-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  28. 05-Apr-2023

    Summons

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  29. 03-Apr-2023

    Summons

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  30. 07-Mar-2023

    Summons

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  31. 01-Feb-2023

    Summons

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  32. 20-Jan-2023

    Summons

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  33. 16-Dec-2022

    Summons

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  34. 25-Nov-2022

    OrdersView PDF

  35. 25-Nov-2022

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed Interim Application No. I/2022 and ordered the impleading of four proposed plaintiffs (Nazneen Shaheen, Nasreen Taj, Syed Mussavveer Ahmed, and Shafi Ulla) as plaintiffs 2-5 in the suit. The court found their presence necessary to effectually adjudicate the property dispute, as they claim equal inheritance rights through their deceased relatives and seek identical reliefs against the defendant. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  36. 25-Nov-2022

    Summons

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  37. 22-Nov-2022

    Orders

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  38. 19-Nov-2022

    Orders

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  39. 16-Nov-2022

    Orders

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  40. 10-Nov-2022

    Orders

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  41. 03-Nov-2022

    Orders

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  42. 27-Oct-2022

    Orders

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  43. 14-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  44. 11-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  45. 30-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  46. 13-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  47. 08-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  48. 19-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  49. 10-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  50. 20-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  51. 22-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  52. 25-May-2022

    Summons

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  53. 06-Apr-2022

    Summons

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  54. 08-Mar-2022

    Summons

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  55. 25-Jan-2022

    Summons

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  56. 21-Dec-2021

    Summons

    Cch35 XXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  57. 20-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 18-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6921/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Interim Application No. I/2022 and ordered the impleading of four proposed plaintiffs (Nazneen Shaheen, Nasreen Taj, Syed Mussavveer Ahmed, and Shafi Ulla) as plaintiffs 2-5 in the suit. The court found their presence necessary to effectually adjudicate the property dispute, as they claim equal inheritance rights through their deceased relatives and seek identical reliefs against the defendant. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case