ARUN CYRIL vs SWIGGY LIMITED — 7793/2024
Case under U/s 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABC010283052024
Filing Number
7793/2024
Filing Date
05-Nov-2024
Registration No
7793/2024
Registration Date
05-Nov-2024
Court
PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Judge
4-Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUN CYRIL
Adv. ANUSHA B REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SWIGGY LIMITED
-
2.ANAND KRIPALU
-
3.SHIHARSHA MAJETY
-
4.SUPARNA MITRA
-
5.SHAILESH VISHNUBAHI HARIBHAKTI
-
6.SAHIL BARUA
-
7.SUMER JUNEJA
-
8.ANAND DANIEL
-
9.ASHUTOSH SHARMA
-
10.ROGER CLARKS RABALAIS
-
11.LAKSHMI NANDAN REDDY OBUL
-
12.GIRISH MENON
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court rejected Swiggy Limited's application to dismiss the plaint filed by Mr. Arun Cyril challenging his employment termination dated August 16, 2024, and the subsequent ESOP (Employee Stock Option Plan) expiration notice. The plaintiff sought a declaration that both notices were illegal and directions to allow exercise of vested stock options. The court held that whether the employment contract is enforceable and whether the termination complies with procedural requirements are matters requiring a full trial, and thus the plaint cannot be summarily rejected at the threshold stage under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Orders
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Orders
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Orders
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
07-Nov-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
25-Oct-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2024
OrdersView PDF
-
02-Dec-2024
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Orders
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
19-Nov-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
16-Nov-2024
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 7793/2024
Summary: The court rejected Swiggy Limited's application to dismiss the plaint filed by Mr. Arun Cyril challenging his employment termination dated August 16, 2024, and the subsequent ESOP (Employee Stock Option Plan) expiration notice. The plaintiff sought a declaration that both notices were illegal and directions to allow exercise of vested stock options. The court held that whether the employment contract is enforceable and whether the termination complies with procedural requirements are matters requiring a full trial, and thus the plaint cannot be summarily rejected at the threshold stage under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts