M/S MARGADARSI CHITS K PVT LTD vs DURAISAMY S — 2475/2021

Case under U/o 21 Rule 11 of Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KABC010282462021

Filing Number

2442/2021

Filing Date

18-Dec-2021

Registration No

2475/2021

Registration Date

21-Dec-2021

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

2-Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 21 Rule 11 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S MARGADARSI CHITS K PVT LTD

    Adv. Jaya Kumara P P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DURAISAMY S

  2. 2.SENTHILKUMAR R

  3. 3.RANGANATHAN M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lokadalath dismissed the execution petition (EX 2475/2021) after M/S Margadarsi Chits K Pvt Ltd (Decree Holder) paid the entire execution amount to the respondents (Duraisamy S, Senthilkumar R, and Ranganathan M). Both parties admitted the payment was complete, and the court allowed the Decree Holder's closure request as the decree was fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    A.D.R.

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  7. 03-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  10. 28-Jul-2025

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  11. 28-Apr-2025

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  12. 24-Feb-2025

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  13. 09-Dec-2024

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  14. 20-Sep-2024

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  15. 10-Jul-2024

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  16. 25-Mar-2024

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  17. 06-Jan-2024

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  18. 30-Oct-2023

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  19. 08-Aug-2023

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  20. 03-Jun-2023

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  21. 04-Mar-2023

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  22. 07-Jan-2023

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  23. 05-Nov-2022

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  24. 21-Oct-2022

    Orders

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  25. 17-Sep-2022

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  26. 23-Aug-2022

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  27. 06-Aug-2022

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  28. 02-Jul-2022

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  29. 09-Jun-2022

    Notice

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  30. 04-Jun-2022

    Orders

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  31. 30-May-2022

    Hearing

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  32. 08-Mar-2022

    Hearing

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  33. 19-Jan-2022

    Hearing

    Cch5 IX Addl. City CIVIL And Sessons Judge

  34. 22-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 18-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2475/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The Lokadalath dismissed the execution petition (EX 2475/2021) after M/S Margadarsi Chits K Pvt Ltd (Decree Holder) paid the entire execution amount to the respondents (Duraisamy S, Senthilkumar R, and Ranganathan M). Both parties admitted the payment was complete, and the court allowed the Decree Holder's closure request as the decree was fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case