KALIRAJU NAIDU M vs POORNAIAH NAIDU M — 7364/2025
Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABC010269322025
Filing Number
7351/2025
Filing Date
17-Oct-2025
Registration No
7364/2025
Registration Date
17-Oct-2025
Court
PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Judge
4-Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALIRAJU NAIDU M
Adv. V NANJUNDE GOWDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.POORNAIAH NAIDU M
-
2.BHARGHAVI NAIDU
Case History
-
26-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
25-Oct-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for an ad-interim injunction order under Order 39 CPC without prejudice. The court found that while the plaintiff claims absolute ownership of the property through a 2000 partition deed, the defendants must be heard before granting interim relief, especially since the plaintiff is questioning the validity of the old partition deed. The court issued suit summons and an emergent notice to the defendants by December 3, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Oct-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
18-Oct-2025
Orders
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 7364/2025
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for an ad-interim injunction order under Order 39 CPC without prejudice. The court found that while the plaintiff claims absolute ownership of the property through a 2000 partition deed, the defendants must be heard before granting interim relief, especially since the plaintiff is questioning the validity of the old partition deed. The court issued suit summons and an emergent notice to the defendants by December 3, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts