CHANNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU PS vs A1 RAHUL ALIAS STAR RAHUL — 2147/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109, 332(b), 324(5), 326(f), 351(2)(3),352,61(2), R/W 3(5). Status: Framing Of Charge Or Plea. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Framing Of Charge Or Plea Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES

CNR: KABC010246802025

Filing Number

2146/2025

Filing Date

22-Sep-2025

Registration No

2147/2025

Registration Date

22-Sep-2025

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

1-Prl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge - Cch-1

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109, 332(b), 324(5), 326(f), 351(2)(3),352,61(2), R/W 3(5)
Karnataka Prevention of Destruction and Loss of Property Act Section 2A
Arms Act Section 25 (1B) (b)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s),3(2)(V-a), 3(2)(iii), 3(2)(V)
Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act 2000 Section 3(1)(i), 3(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A1 RAHUL ALIAS STAR RAHUL

  2. 2.A2 MUNIRAJU ALIAS HOOVA

  3. 3.A3 PRAVEEN B ALIAS PRAVI

  4. 4.A4 WILLIAM ALIAS WILLIAM KEITH

  5. 5.A5 SALMAN ALIAS SHAIK MEHABOOB SALMAN ALIAS SATTAL

  6. 6.A6 NAVEEN KUMARA C ALIAS BANG NAVEENA ALIAS NAVEENA

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge - Cch-1

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge - Cch-1

  4. 14-Jan-2026

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge - Cch-1

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru dismissed the successive bail applications filed by Accused Nos. 4 and 6 under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found no changed circumstances warranting reconsideration, as the materials produced with the charge sheet were identical to those available during earlier rejected bail petitions. The court determined there were sufficient prima facie grounds to believe the accused were involved in the organized crime conspiracy, considering their criminal antecedents, eye-witness evidence, and CCTV footage supporting the prosecution's case of pre-planned property destruction and assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge - Cch-1

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Prl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge - Cch-1

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge - Cch-1

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge - Cch-1

  10. 12-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge - Cch-1

  11. 06-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge - Cch-1

  12. 04-Nov-2025

    Hearing

  13. 24-Oct-2025

    Hearing

  14. 14-Oct-2025

    Hearing

  15. 04-Oct-2025

    Objection

  16. 23-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 22-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2147/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru dismissed the successive bail applications filed by Accused Nos. 4 and 6 under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found no changed circumstances warranting reconsideration, as the materials produced with the charge sheet were identical to those available during earlier rejected bail petitions. The court determined there were sufficient prima facie grounds to believe the accused were involved in the organized crime conspiracy, considering their criminal antecedents, eye-witness evidence, and CCTV footage supporting the prosecution's case of pre-planned property destruction and assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case