VISHWANATH B N vs RAMANLAL M SHA — 6787/2016

Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABC010208172016

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

Filing Number

6484/2016

Filing Date

07-09-2016

Registration No

6787/2016

Registration Date

21-09-2016

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

4-CCH25 III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

U/o VII Rule 1 of CPC

Petitioner(s)

VISHWANATH B N

Adv. B N JAYADEVA

Respondent(s)

RAMANLAL M SHA

MITESH KUMAR J SHA

KAVITHA VENKATESH

MS RAJARAJESHWARI BUILDCON PVT LTD

THE SUB REGISTRAR

THE COMMISSIONER, BBMP

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CCH25 III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

06-03-2026

SUMMONS

11-02-2026

EVIDENCE

31-01-2026

EVIDENCE

18-12-2025

SUMMONS

24-11-2025

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

27-02-2017
Issue
30-05-2017
Orders
22-07-2019
Orders
20-08-2019
Issue
30-09-2021
Issue
13-07-2023
Orders
13-07-2023
Issue
06-10-2023
Orders
06-07-2024
Deposition
27-07-2024
Deposition

Case Summary OS NO. 6787/2016 - The case involves a dispute over plot number 002 within an 8,000 sq ft property. The witness (PW1) testified on 27.07.2024 regarding a developer's authorization to market certain plots and the subsequent sale of plot 002 to the third defendant. The court examined the sale deed (Exhibit 35) and the witness's testimony confirming the property details. The case was adjourned to allow the third defendant's counsel to file a continued cross-examination, with the proceeding to resume at a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary OS NO. 6787/2016 - The case involves a dispute over plot number 002 within an 8,000 sq ft property. The witness (PW1) testified on 27.07.2024 regarding a developer's authorization to market certain plots and the subsequent sale of plot 002 to the third defendant. The court examined the sale deed (Exhibit 35) and the witness's testimony confirming the property details. The case was adjourned to allow the third defendant's counsel to file a continued cross-examination, with the proceeding to resume at a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case