KODIGEHALLI P.S. vs A1 GIRI ALIAS GIRISH UGREGOWDA — 1075/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307R/W34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th March 2026.

SC - SESSION CASES

CNR: KABC010184092023

Case disposed

Filing Number

1075/2023

Filing Date

12-07-2023

Registration No

1075/2023

Registration Date

12-07-2023

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

1-PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE - CCH-1

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307R/W34

Petitioner(s)

KODIGEHALLI P.S.

Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

A1 GIRI ALIAS GIRISH UGREGOWDA

A2 SRINIVAS ALIAS RX SEENA

A3 NANDISH K.S. ALIAS RAJATH

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE - CCH-1

06-03-2026

Disposed

19-02-2026

JUDGEMENTS

31-12-2025

EVIDENCE

18-11-2025

HEARING

17-10-2025

HEARING

Interim Orders

19-02-2026
Deposition

The court in case S.C. No. 1075/2023 (Bangalore Principal City Civil and Sessions Court) has treated the witness as an adverse witness based on his testimony given on 19.02.2026. The witness, Manjunath (37 years old), testified that the three accused were known to him but did not commit any assault against him, contradicting the prosecution's case alleging an attack on 05.01.2022 where the first accused allegedly struck him with a machete. The court permitted cross-examination by the defence counsel, treating the witness's contradictory statements and apparent reconciliation with the accused as grounds for declaring him an adverse witness to the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court in case S.C. No. 1075/2023 (Bangalore Principal City Civil and Sessions Court) has treated the witness as an adverse witness based on his testimony given on 19.02.2026. The witness, Manjunath (37 years old), testified that the three accused were known to him but did not commit any assault against him, contradicting the prosecution's case alleging an attack on 05.01.2022 where the first accused allegedly struck him with a machete. The court permitted cross-examination by the defence counsel, treating the witness's contradictory statements and apparent reconciliation with the accused as grounds for declaring him an adverse witness to the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case