KODIGEHALLI P.S. vs A1 GIRI ALIAS GIRISH UGREGOWDA — 1075/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307R/W34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th March 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KABC010184092023
Filing Number
1075/2023
Filing Date
12-07-2023
Registration No
1075/2023
Registration Date
12-07-2023
Court
PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Judge
1-PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE - CCH-1
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KODIGEHALLI P.S.
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
A1 GIRI ALIAS GIRISH UGREGOWDA
A2 SRINIVAS ALIAS RX SEENA
A3 NANDISH K.S. ALIAS RAJATH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE - CCH-1
Disposed
JUDGEMENTS
EVIDENCE
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-02-2026 | JUDGEMENTS |
| 31-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-11-2025 | HEARING |
| 17-10-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
The court in case S.C. No. 1075/2023 (Bangalore Principal City Civil and Sessions Court) has treated the witness as an adverse witness based on his testimony given on 19.02.2026. The witness, Manjunath (37 years old), testified that the three accused were known to him but did not commit any assault against him, contradicting the prosecution's case alleging an attack on 05.01.2022 where the first accused allegedly struck him with a machete. The court permitted cross-examination by the defence counsel, treating the witness's contradictory statements and apparent reconciliation with the accused as grounds for declaring him an adverse witness to the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court in case S.C. No. 1075/2023 (Bangalore Principal City Civil and Sessions Court) has treated the witness as an adverse witness based on his testimony given on 19.02.2026. The witness, Manjunath (37 years old), testified that the three accused were known to him but did not commit any assault against him, contradicting the prosecution's case alleging an attack on 05.01.2022 where the first accused allegedly struck him with a machete. The court permitted cross-examination by the defence counsel, treating the witness's contradictory statements and apparent reconciliation with the accused as grounds for declaring him an adverse witness to the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts