NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA vs SHARADAMMA — 151/2022

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34(2). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

A.P. - Arbitration Petition

CNR: KABC010170192022

Case disposedSub Stage

Filing Number

139/2022

Filing Date

23-06-2022

Registration No

151/2022

Registration Date

23-06-2022

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

3-CCH17 II ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34(2)

Petitioner(s)

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

Adv. SHILPA SHAH

Respondent(s)

SHARADAMMA

THE ARBITRATOR AND SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER I

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY

1. A)- BYRAMMA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-CCH17 II ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

07-01-2026

A.D.R.

19-11-2025

ARGUMENTS

18-10-2025

ARGUMENTS

22-09-2025

ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders
14-03-2026
Decree

Case Summary: 151/2022 The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a petition challenging an arbitral award dated 11 January 2022 concerning land acquisition for the Bengaluru-Tumkur highway project. The case was resolved through Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution mechanism) on 14 March 2026 when both parties reached a settlement based on a joint memorandum. The court closed the petition as settled, with no costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 151/2022 The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a petition challenging an arbitral award dated 11 January 2022 concerning land acquisition for the Bengaluru-Tumkur highway project. The case was resolved through Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution mechanism) on 14 March 2026 when both parties reached a settlement based on a joint memorandum. The court closed the petition as settled, with no costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case