LATHARAGHAVAN vs SRILATHA — 3934/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABC010162502022
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
3904/2022
Filing Date
17-06-2022
Registration No
3934/2022
Registration Date
17-06-2022
Court
PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Judge
6-CCH13 V ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LATHARAGHAVAN
Adv. MANJUNATHA G
Respondent(s)
SRILATHA
RITHIKA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-CCH13 V ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 19-01-2026 | ORDERS |
| 09-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 19-11-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court dismissed the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint in this defamation suit. The plaintiff (Smt. Latha Raghavan) sued for Rs. 25 lakhs in damages and permanent injunction against the defendants for spreading false allegations that damaged her reputation and caused her daughter's marriage to be cancelled. The court found the plaint properly disclosed a cause of action, was correctly valued with appropriate court fees paid, and was not barred by any law, therefore rejecting all grounds for rejection under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court dismissed the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint in this defamation suit. The plaintiff (Smt. Latha Raghavan) sued for Rs. 25 lakhs in damages and permanent injunction against the defendants for spreading false allegations that damaged her reputation and caused her daughter's marriage to be cancelled. The court found the plaint properly disclosed a cause of action, was correctly valued with appropriate court fees paid, and was not barred by any law, therefore rejecting all grounds for rejection under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts