TAHASILDAR, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK vs SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-1, KIADB — 26/2023

Case under U/s 18 of Land Acquisition Act. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases

CNR: KABC010143782023

Case disposedSub Stage

Filing Number

26/2023

Filing Date

06-06-2023

Registration No

26/2023

Registration Date

07-06-2023

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

3-CCH17 II ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

U/s 18 of Land Acquisition Act

Petitioner(s)

TAHASILDAR, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK

Adv. ADVOCATE

Respondent(s)

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-1, KIADB

Hearing History

Judge: 3-CCH17 II ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

04-03-2026

A.D.R.

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE

24-01-2026

EVIDENCE

13-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

The Lok Adalath allowed the reference and held that survey no. 148/2A property was validly confiscated in favor of the Government under the Urban Land Sealing and Regulation Act 1976, with no other claimants having rights over it. The court directed that the Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk is entitled to receive the compensation deposited with accrued interest, subject to producing the confiscation order under the ULC Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath allowed the reference and held that survey no. 148/2A property was validly confiscated in favor of the Government under the Urban Land Sealing and Regulation Act 1976, with no other claimants having rights over it. The court directed that the Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk is entitled to receive the compensation deposited with accrued interest, subject to producing the confiscation order under the ULC Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case