MANJULA N vs MUNIRAJU — 3863/2024
Case under U/s 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABC010141052024
Filing Number
3871/2024
Filing Date
04-Jun-2024
Registration No
3863/2024
Registration Date
04-Jun-2024
Court
PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Judge
4-Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANJULA N
Adv. G H NADIGER
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNIRAJU
-
2.RAJA
Case History
-
26-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the defendants disputed whether the disputed area constituted a public road or private property—a matter requiring full trial determination. Consequently, the balance of convenience and irreparable loss arguments also failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Issues
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Orders
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Orders
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Orders
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
25-Oct-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
17-Jun-2025
Notice
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2025
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2024
A.D.R.
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
30-Nov-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
A.D.R.
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
31-Jul-2024
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2024
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Summons
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
05-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 3863/2024
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the defendants disputed whether the disputed area constituted a public road or private property—a matter requiring full trial determination. Consequently, the balance of convenience and irreparable loss arguments also failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts