RITA RANI vs THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANGARA PALIKE — 3583/2024
Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABC010132072024
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
3590/2024
Filing Date
28-05-2024
Registration No
3583/2024
Registration Date
28-05-2024
Court
PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Judge
4-CCH25 III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RITA RANI
Adv. RAVISHANKAR S
AROCKIA DASS
GLORIA
Respondent(s)
THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANGARA PALIKE
ZONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, BBMP
MARY WILSON
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CCH25 III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary In case O.S./3583/2024, on 30.01.2026, the court examined the first witness (PW.1) and administered oath. The witness testified regarding property allotted to the plaintiff's grandfather in 1947, producing documentary evidence including an allotment list (Exhibit-2) bearing the grandfather's name. The witness further deposed that the plaintiff and family have been in continuous possession and occupation of the property since 1942, and that defendants 1 and 2 are now benefiting from the property which was originally allotted to the plaintiff's family. Further cross-examination is pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In case O.S./3583/2024, on 30.01.2026, the court examined the first witness (PW.1) and administered oath. The witness testified regarding property allotted to the plaintiff's grandfather in 1947, producing documentary evidence including an allotment list (Exhibit-2) bearing the grandfather's name. The witness further deposed that the plaintiff and family have been in continuous possession and occupation of the property since 1942, and that defendants 1 and 2 are now benefiting from the property which was originally allotted to the plaintiff's family. Further cross-examination is pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts